THOMAS EAKINS (1844 - 1916)
Salutat, 1898
Oil on Canvas
49 3/4 x 39 3/4"
Collection: Addison Gallery of American Art, Andover, Massachusetts
currently on loan to LACMA
"Manly Pursuits: The Sporting Images of Thomas Eakins" at LACMA, July 25 - October 17, 2010, is an informative show about the pursuit of the masculine in America, particularly when viewed in conjunction with the adjoining exhibition of
Catherine Opie's photographs of high school football players and their games. At first glance, Eakins' frank admiration of his young athletes feels healthy and natural. His skillfull intelligent compositions of naked men leaping, jumping, diving, swimming, wrestling, are dignified and bracing and tough. The exhibition rooms contribute to the sober male mood, vast and spare and done in dark manly shades of raw and burnt umber, rugged sienna. No sissies here. "Salutat" recalls the amphitheatre of ancient times: the crowd may be boistrous, filled with specific, recognizable, familiar faces (ours), but the athlete is faceless, his attendants anonymous. He is the pure light in the frame. He is the noble Everyman.
But In the bright white of the adjacent rooms scenes from the arena continue, and the resulting dissonance comes not just, I think, from adjusting your eyes to the light. These modern-day gladiators are heavily armored and padded and yet disconcertingly vulnerable. Their portraits are oversized and imposing, but they stare back at the camera dumbly and uncertainly or else with cocky yet clumsy, unconvincing bravado. They don't look ready to be heroes or any kind of Everyman. We are anonymous now and they are the specific, not men and more than boys, but barely, even with all the brightly colored gear.
If you interrupt the narrative flow and trespass between the two shows (and you can), if you retrace your steps and return, or alternate between the light and the dark, you become aware of an uneasiness and you begin to look for the source of it. Is it you, or is it in the works themselves? What are we looking at, and why does it make us uncomfortable? Is it the simple depiction of males, nude or partly nude or self-consciously posed, that bothers us? Whether it's a sweaty teenager's bare midriff or a group of Eakins' students naked in a swimming hole, what's going on that we find compelling and yet vaguely unacceptable? Of course there's none of the mindless rush and high of ESPN / Fox Sports to reassure us, to make the eroticism safe and commercial, but neither is the message entirely unconscious either. There's uneasy desire going on here, but in a more subtle and interesting way than you might suspect. Others have written about it all better than I can, however. [
Los Angeles County Museum of Art on Fire, for one, on the history of the best American painting in the museum's collection].
Rumor has it there will be a catalogue later on, of the Eakins show. I hope so. This is a smart show and the juxtaposition with Opie is provocative. I think both artists have important things to say to us about what it means to be a man and manly in America. But go see for yourself.
See Also:
American Stories and
Manly Pursuits