'60s Radical

Somewhere in Ohio, once upon a time in the 60s.
Say what you will about the Internet, it's a way for people to find people, no matter how many times you have moved, changed jobs or entered witness protection. I received this image at Christmas by e-mail from an old acquaintance I haven't seen or spoken to since ninth grade. A nice surprise. You can run but you can't hide, but it doesn't need to end badly. Plus it's not like I went to Canada to dodge the draft and couldn't come back again.
I can't remember but I think this photograph was taken at some sort of end-of-summer picnic for members of the school orchestra. I'm the one in the middle of the back row. I can't remember a lot of things but I remember a little. I remember John, Jim, and Karen, and I remember Jim played bass and Karen played violin. I remember the girls giggling a lot. I remember thinking the guy in the white t-shirt and shorts seemed to know something he wasn't sharing with the rest of us. I remember wondering what it could be.
I remember thinking that some day I would be very far away from where I was then, and I would be doing exactly what I wanted to be doing. And it would be great. I remember thinking I was clever, and also wondering just how clever I really was. Which is the point of life, of course, to find out just how much of something -- cleverness, ambition, stamina, conviction -- you've really got.
At some point last week I posted my five-hundredth blog entry here. I can assure you it was not my plan when I was in the orchestra in the ninth grade to be doing this, or in fact to be doing pretty much any of what I am doing now. I don't think I had an actual plan back then, but if someone had told me how things would turn out I think I might have tried to come up with one. Tried to, at least. Maybe.
Maybe not. I was something of a rebel in those days believe it or not, different drummer, my own beat, path less taken, that sort of thing. As I remember it at any rate. I was also fairly convinced that I was right about the way I saw things -- that the Vietnam War was a bad thing, that the Equal Rights Amendment was a good thing and we'd be sorry some day if we didn't get it passed. Not everybody agreed with me, as you might imagine (it was Ohio) but I was pretty certain I was right. Looking back, I still think so.
Of course I underestimated the opposition. The wife of my high school health and civics teacher spit on me for something I said, either about the War or about equal rights for women, I don't remember which. I don't think she knew her husband who was also the basketball coach was sleeping with one of the cheerleaders, but then you never know. Maybe she did. Everybody else knew.
I was reading this morning about the tea-bag people. It is very hard sometimes to have compassion for people with whom you disagree, and I'm sure they feel the same way. I think it's because you have to wait so long to see how things turn out, in order to know who's really right. What seemed radical in the 60s seems like common sense now. But not then. Speak out against the war back then and you got spit on. Or killed. Four dead in Ohio, as you may recall.
I don't know what happened to all of my brave comrades in the orchestra. I wonder if they are ever surprised by the way things have turned out. I wonder if they have found out yet just how much of what they thought they might need for the journey they already had. And I wonder if they know yet who ended up being right about the way things would be when we got to where we were going.




i love the picture.
the girls are having so much fun.
the plan i had was to leave high school, get a job and get out of the house. now!!! which i did. boy, what a mistake.
probably best you didn't have a plan.
love you dearly
Reply to this
So you have big ears? Maybe the guy with t-shirts knew that (at that time) glasses were horrible... Most of people don't realize how things have changed (or not) as they don't take time and opportunity to reflect on it, to turn and look at the journey made... in the good or in the bad direction. That's why I enjoy your writing, because you do.
Reply to this
Speaking of not knowing how things will turn out...BBC TV has just shown a documentary on Daniel Ellsberg, partial nemesis of Richard Nixon (though of course much of Nixon's comeuppance was self-inflicted). Ellsberg, originally a hawkish-ish analyst for the Johnson administration, turned through his courageous rite of passage into a full-time conscience for the world. One of the very many aspects of Watergate that suggested the existence of a benevolent supreme being was the revelation, during his trial for espionage, that Nixon's gang had burgled his (Ellsberg's) psychiatrist. This led to a mistrial and he escaped God knows how long in prison.
One of the Nixon tapes used on the programme had him saying to Kissinger (about bombing the North) something like: 'The trouble with you, Henry, is that you care about civilian casualties. I don't give a damn about them.' An attitude that permeated his team and led, among other crimes, to the Kent State shootings that you rightly keep in our minds.
Reply to this
I admit I panicked for a moment -- I thought you might somehow tie Daniel Ellsberg to Barbara Skelton and I was prepared to be dismayed (!)
But instead you raise an important point about the way events can shift the historical perspective and suddenly obscure parts of the truth in shadows. And of course, people can also change their minds, I suppose. There was a time when there were only hawks in Washington, then suddenly it seemed you couldn't find anyone who'd ever been in favor of the war in Vietnam, and then in the last few years there's been yet another revision...
To me the great tragedy of Kent State was not only the death of young Americans, but the killing of young Americans by other young Americans. In that confrontation of National Guard soldiers and student protestors a generation was turned against itself at the instigation of their fathers, and one more time a country was divided. The wounds inflicted then have still not healed.
Reply to this
I wouldn't have put it past her - she was in New York in the early 60s! (With Charles Addams among others)
Reply to this
> It is very hard sometimes to have compassion
> for people with whom you disagree, and I'm
> sure they feel the same way. I think it's
> because you have to wait so long to see how
> things turn out, in order to know who's really
> right.
I have a rather more cynical view. I can't believe people with working brains can cling so avidly to such stupidity, so it's hard for me to address them. I think they don't like us because, being smart, we seem dangerous, foreign and smug.
Reply to this